Fluency Small Tenant Beta ReleaseSee What is Coming Next

Fluency vs. Google Chronicle

Comparing a streaming SIEM with built-in AI workflows vs. a Google-scale log lake. Speed and intelligence aren't the same thing.

AI Implementation

Where Is Chronicle's AI?

To be fair, Chronicle is leveraging AI within its rule engine to help craft better detections. But there's no operational AI responsible for investigating or responding to alerts. Because Chronicle does not reduce the volume of events and alerts, performing atomic AI analysis on each would likely be cost-prohibitive.

BFluency

DGoogle Chronicle

Google Chronicle: Chronicle is leveraging AI within its rule engine to help craft better detections. But there's no operational AI responsible for investigating or responding to alerts. Because Chronicle does not reduce the volume of events and alerts, performing atomic AI analysis on each would likely be cost-prohibitive.
• No public implementation of ISO 42001 guardrails
• No use of MCP or interoperable AI standards
• Detection limited to predefined rule logic and enrichment
• No user-definable workflows or streaming memory
• AI is passive—never executes decisions or closes issues
Fluency: The result is a stark contrast to Fluency, where AI plays an active, decision-making role in the SOC. Fluency's AI design and execution capabilities go far beyond enrichment to actual operational workflows.
• Streaming Multi-Context Processing (MCP) engine
• Analyst workflows built into the system (Validate → Scope → Respond → Review)
• AI closes and annotates tickets automatically
• FPL enables behavior-level analysis with memory and feedback
• Real-time detection with analyst-level response

Detection Philosophy

Log Lake or Live System?

Chronicle excels at storing, indexing, and correlating logs at scale. But detection happens after the fact. Fluency processes events in real time—building context and triggering responses the moment events arrive.

Google Chronicle: Chronicle excels at storing, indexing, and correlating logs at scale. But detection happens after the fact. It's built around the concept of a log lake—storing everything first, then analyzing retrospectively.
• Focused on ingestion and search—not streaming analysis
• Events processed after landing, not during transit
• Detection relies on rules and correlation, not stateful logic
• AI assists threat hunting, but not detection or response
• No support for inline automation or memory-aware processes
Fluency: Fluency processes events in real time—building context and triggering responses the moment events arrive. It's built for streaming processing and immediate action rather than retrospective analysis.
• Inline streaming analysis with memory
• Detections are part of live workflows, not queries
• Uses context chains and process memory, not one-time matches
• Behavioral tracking, anomaly detection, and response are built-in
• FPL transforms alerts into actions—at speed

Direct Comparison

Head-to-Head: Fluency vs Google Chronicle

See how Fluency's streaming AI workflows compare to Chronicle's log lake architecture. While Chronicle excels at storage and search, Fluency excels at real-time detection and response.

Feature	Fluency	Google Chronicle
Detection Engine	MCP with memory & workflows	Rules and correlation layers
Latency	Sub-second	Batch-based indexing delay
AI Workflows	Fully integrated into detection/response	Absent—only enrichment support
Automation	Native action engine with ticketing	No built-in action execution
Roadmap Transparency	Full (AI, ISO 42001, feedback loop)	Limited and generic

Real-time processing.: Fluency processes events as they arrive with sub-second latency, while Chronicle relies on batch-based indexing with delays.
AI workflows.: Fluency has AI fully integrated into detection and response, while Chronicle only uses AI for enrichment support.
Automation capabilities.: Fluency includes a native action engine with ticketing, while Chronicle has no built-in action execution.
Memory and context.: Fluency uses MCP for streaming memory across events, while Chronicle processes events in isolation.
Compliance alignment.: Fluency is ISO 42001-aligned with full transparency, while Chronicle lacks visible AI governance structure.
Workflow integration.: Fluency structures detection into executable workflows, while Chronicle treats detection as separate from response.

Tired of waiting for detections? Streamline your SOC with Fluency.

Try Fluency Free